this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
211 points (99.5% liked)

Not The Onion

11812 readers
792 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Exactly, and the report uses the term "memetic" to distinguish from its frequent use to mean "image macro". Unfortunately the article headline chose to confuse things.

"Advanced memetic engineering attacks could progressively undermine trust in financial markets and institutions, causing a steady, incremental impact on market stability rather than a sudden breakdown“
RAND Corporation, Technological and Economic Threats to the US Financial System, July 2024

The article body does a good job covering the topic, its a shame they chose such a clumsy headline.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Image memes were never the only memes in internet lingo, and the original Dawkins term is exactly how they're using it, as the analogue for gene, but with ideas generally. That's all fine.

But that makes their core concept "people might spread ideas we don't like".

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

people might spread ideas we dont like

So how would that even be justiciable?

[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)