this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
559 points (95.3% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9509 readers
434 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18629062

According to the debate, they had their reasons. But still -- when one hundred and eighty six nations say one thing, and two say another, you have to wonder about the two.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 weeks ago (17 children)

North Korea's famine during the 90s was due to western sanctions after everyone they used to buy food from left their economic bloc, not because they don't believe people should have food.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago (10 children)

Maybe they should start spending their missile program money on developing their nation's agriculture rather than relying on food imports.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -4 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

What and get invaded by the guys who fly nuclear-capable bombers right along their border and practice invading them every year?

Last time they got caught lacking, 20% of their population died, many of them burned alive in their apartments by napalm.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We’re talking about the same North Korea who regularly threatens to nuke their neighbor and has gone as far as shooting a missile over Japan? Something tells me they are the instigators.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Even putting aside the puppet state argument, does that suddenly make it okay to threaten innocents with nukes?

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course it doesn't, that's why it's fucked up that the US has flown nuclear-capable planes directly along North Korea's border most years for the last 40 or so.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hope you realize there’s a big difference between “can carry nukes” and “actually is carrying nukes”. You could drop one from a civilian airliner if you felt so inclined, doesn’t mean civilian planes are a danger to us all.

Besides, when the North has a military over twice the size of the south and is constantly saber rattling, it makes sense to keep an eye on the border. Wonder why they are spending so much on their military and not on, you know, their citizens.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Hope you realize there’s a big difference between “can carry nukes” and “actually is carrying nukes”.

Correct. The missiles were not actually carrying nukes, but they were capable of carrying nukes. North Korea fired missiles that were capable of carrying nukes in response to the US flying bombers capable of carrying nukes along their border to express "If you nuke us, we can at least do some damage"; mutually assured destruction.

Besides, when the North has a military over twice the size of the south and is constantly saber rattling

The North is not just up against the South, but against the entire US military.

Wonder why they are spending so much on their military and not on, you know, their citizens.

Because if they didn't, the US would make an example out of them the way they did Iraq and Afghanistan and Syria and Libya and Yugoslavia.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)