this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
1022 points (98.5% liked)

News

23367 readers
3072 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

SpaceX’s Starship launches at the company’s Starbase facility near Boca Chica, Texas, have allegedly been contaminating local bodies of water with mercury for years. The news arrives in an exclusive CNBCreport on August 12, which cites internal documents and communications between local Texas regulators and the Environmental Protection Agency.

SpaceX’s fourth Starship test launch in June was its most successful so far—but the world’s largest and most powerful rocket ever built continues to wreak havoc on nearby Texas communities, wildlife, and ecosystems. But after repeated admonishments, reviews, and ignored requests, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) have had enough.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

When people praise SpaceX, the company, it bothers me.

When people praise an engineer at SpaceX that does something cool, I am happy for the engineer.

I’m really not sure why I have to explain this to you.

You don't have to explain either of those things to me, you can just answer the question I asked:

K, so when people praise SpaceX’s engineers for designing unprecedented machines that do things that no one has ever seen before, that doesn’t bother you?

i.e. when people praise SpaceX's rockets and launches, does that bother you? Is that praising the company or praising the engineer in your mind?

At the end of the day what the company does is an output of the workers. When people praise what SpaceX does they are praising the workers, unless you view the company as just the CEO, in which case you're falling into the folly of hero worship.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is some real "corporations are people" bullshit.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

No, that is referring to the idea of a corporation having legal rights the way that a person does. That is not what we're talking about. We're talking about the output of a corporation. Is the output of a corporation the result of the CEO or of a bunch of workers?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

See, the fun thing here is that I've answered the question you keep rephrasing multiple times the same way. You just don't like my answer because it goes against your whole claim that this has something to do with Elon Musk.

And you are doing everything you can to defend a company which is destroying the ozone layer.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You literally have not answered the question.

When people praise what SpaceX does, does that bother you?

Simple question, answer it, not questions that you insert.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I, once again, have no idea why this has to be spelled out for you, but of course it bothers me when people praise a corporation that is destroying the ozone layer.

Similarly, it would bother me if someone praised Shell Oil or Nestle.

Why is it so hard for you to understand that SpaceX is destroying the ozone layer and that is a bad thing?

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I, once again, have no idea why this has to be spelled out for you, but of course it bothers me when people praise a corporation that is destroying the ozone layer.

OK so when people praise SpaceX for destroying the ozone layer, which is totally a real thing that people praise them for, that bothers you.

But you're ok with it when people praise SpaceX for creating reusable rockets that are more environmentally friendly than single use rockets?

Or no, people should shit on them for creating reusable rockets because something something musk makes you angry?

End of the day you think that because SpaceX is a Musk owned company, praise for what SpaceX does is praise for Musk, whereas people who don't engage in hero worship view it as praise for the hardworking engineers who actually did those things.

And stop bringing up the ozone issue, we've been over this. Yes, it's an issue that was literally just discovered and reported on, usually once you discover an issue you give people time to address it. That's what happens when people try to do new things that have never been done before. If they ignore the issue and keep destroying the ozone layer then they will be the world destroying villains that you want them so badly to be.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Got it. And when Exxon ends up heating the world beyond 2 degrees C, then we can criticize them. Until then, criticizing Exxon means criticizing every secretary in their branch office in Des Moines.