this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1369 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

2600 readers
20 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

To clarify, the pictured poster Caroline Kwan is an ally, not a TERF. The TERFs referred to in the title are the ones ‘protecting a very specific idea of what a woman is’

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

I'll repeat what I said elsewhere about this debate. You probably wonder "so what should the rules be to include an athlete for women's sports? Surely there must be some rule". This is understandable but please realize that the transphobes who are pushing this aren't concerned at all with the specifics. They're not even interested in women's sports. They want to remove trans women from public life altogether. Not just sports but everywhere. Intimidating trans athletes into obscurity is just their most recent tactic.

So please remember that there is no test that will satisfy the transphobes. There is no fair rule that can be agreed upon, because the transphobes will always keep moving the goalposts. This gets extremely complex. There is no use in debating these people. They will debate forever, because the actual deep down motivation is disgust with trans people.

Save your energy. Don't debate transphobes.

[–] FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

That's why transphobes shouldn't set the rules. And when the rules are set, there will be backlash, which needs to be ignored by the scientific community and the authorities governing professional sport.

This is a tall order, but I do think the question of where the line must be drawn to guarantee fairness is a question worth answering, preferrably not by me, because I don't have the credentials to deliberate on what's fair and what isn't. This is the role of science.

load more comments (7 replies)