this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
90 points (98.9% liked)

3DPrinting

15250 readers
33 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Stratasys is losing ground because their massively overpriced ecosystem is getting outclassed by literally everything else in the market. So why improve if you can just sue your competition out of the US market?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AliasVortex@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

Linking the patents listed, because I'm struggling to understand what technologies are spelled out in them (I'm taking my best guesses here, so feel free to correct me if I'm misreading something, because I probably am):

  • 9421713- purge towers apparently
  • 9592660- heated beds/ removable build plates
  • 7555357- something to do slicing workflow/ path generation
  • 9168698 / 10556381- detecting that force has been applied to the extruder

Given how broad these are, this case could have some less than pleasant ripple effects on the rest of the 3d printing community, like opening the doors to drag ultimaker/ prusa into court over random commonplace stuff.

The specific patent links seem to be broken. All return 403. Here are functional alternatives.

[–] jrgd@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The specific patent links seem to be broken. All return 403. Here are functional alternatives.

[–] AliasVortex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Thank you! Updated my comment with your links (The .gov site for the patent office is ironically difficult to permalink to, go figure)

load more comments (5 replies)