this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
30 points (94.1% liked)

Legal News

189 readers
187 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The decision revives a lawsuit filed by 94 women who said their OB-GYN sexually abused them. Previously, a lower court determined that the actions they alleged had to be treated as medical malpractice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] b000rg@midwest.social 15 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's insane to me that judges can just make these stupid ass rulings that are obviously wrong and just never face any consequences. Like why hasn't that lower court judge been removed from his position for clearly making a biased ruling to protect a sexual abuser???

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] b000rg@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I suppose that literally answers my question. Lol

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, it's almost impossible to remove a sitting judge. For federal judges, they have lifetime appointments and the only option to remove them is impeachment. Only 15 federal judges have been impeached, 8 being convicted in the US history. State judges are elected, and only 18 states have a recall process, which is lengthy and heavily stacked in the judge's favor. So the only reasonable way to remove them is to elect someone else, when their term ends.

And they have absolute immunity for all judicial actions.

load more comments (3 replies)