this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
628 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2433 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As the vice president introduced her new running mate at an energetic rally in Philadelphia, he quickly demonstrated his ability to deliver searing attacks against Donald Trump and JD Vance.

America’s introduction to Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota began with a half-hour of cheering for Vice President Kamala Harris and ended with some of the sharpest attacks Democrats have leveled against former President Donald J. Trump and his running mate, Senator JD Vance of Ohio.

Before a raucous crowd in Philadelphia, Ms. Harris and Mr. Walz presented the Minnesotan as a folksy former schoolteacher and football coach who had inspired his students, served in the military and improved his constituents’ lives.

But it was his ability to deliver searing yet accessible attacks against their Republican opponents that won Mr. Walz a place on the national ticket, and during his first rally, he did not miss his marks.

“Donald Trump sees the world a little differently than us,” he said. “First of all, he doesn’t know the first thing about service. He doesn’t have time for it because he’s too busy serving himself.”

Then came the dagger. “Violent crime was up under Donald Trump,” he said, before pausing for effect. “That’s not even counting the crimes he committed.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 182 points 3 months ago (3 children)

About time the Dems had some charismatic candidates who are willing to push back against the bullying of Republicans instead of taking the high road.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 44 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thank God. Finally sounds like they believe in themselves which gives other people a reason to believe in them. Finally fighting.

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately this approach takes the focus away from policy, but since people doesn't seem understand what's at stake it's a necessary change.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think a lot of things started to go wrong right after Hilary said "When they go low, we go high".

Back then they were labouring under the assumption that the Republican Party (and voters) actually had a sense of shame; that if you stick to the "political" fights rather than throwing some shade, you'll eventually come out on top.

Now they (finally) know better. You gotta throw some shade in with that policy, and if you can make the shade humorous, all the better. Because the only thing Trump cares about is being seen as 'strong', and that's why this whole 'weird' thing is working as well as it has.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 3 months ago

It was Michelle Obama who coined that, but you're right otherwise.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Now they (finally) know better.

I kind of doubt Clinton and Biden approve of this shift and still think taking the high road is the right way. Biden is still taking the high road!

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago

And that's why they lost; and would have lost again.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 3 months ago

Wonder if there were a bunch of strategists who have been cooking this strategy for a few cycles already, but they were never allowed to unleash it.

[–] ExtravagantEnzyme@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Basically couldn't have come any later really. They're already coming out the gates scrabbling with just 3 months and change until voting starts.

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 94 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Only having them campaign for a few months is refreshing. I'd love to see it happen more often.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Plus it minimized fascist election fuckery...it's not zero and we need people watching electors that think they can lie... Trying to subvert the will of the voters should be considered treason and treated as such legally.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

America is one of the only countries with such a long election cycle. Up here in Canada it's much shorter thankfully. Get it over with and let people get on with their lives.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 months ago

And importantly, let the politicians actually get something other than fundraising done in a term.

[–] niucllos@lemm.ee 51 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not that I ascribe this to strategy, but I wonder if this will work in their favor. The last minute change of jockey has been dominating the news since it happened, and pushing Trump's ridiculous things to the side. This ticket will have huge and new name recognition in voters' minds, and a lot less time to get mud to stick

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 44 points 3 months ago

I think it will definitely work in their favor, and I hope it kicks off a trend towards a shorter election season, but the corporate media will resist that.