this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
1532 points (99.0% liked)

Memes

45726 readers
634 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] menixator@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Related announcement: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/privacy-preserving-attribution

TLDR: Mozilla wants your data and it's opt out. If you're on FF 128 it's already on and you will have to turn it off manually. Shame how they have fallen this low. The LEAST they could have done is show a pop up announcement when the user upgraded to 128.

Also: +1 to Librewolf. Mozilla is definitely going to try more scummy crap like this in the future. Definitely the better option over Firefox.

[โ€“] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I just read that whole article and it sounds like a good implementation? Companies want to know how effective their ads are, and I like their approach of trying to find a way to provide this without wholesale personal data collection. They even say at the end that they don't get the data either. It sounds like a reasonable thing to try and standardize.

[โ€“] menixator@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not commenting on implementation itself but rather on how Mozilla went about with an opt-out approach into the collection program (even if it was for testing) to a community they have cultivated with the promise of privacy.

Collecting my data is a big deal. It doesn't matter how it is used. I should at least consent to it.

[โ€“] timestatic 1 points 3 months ago

I feel like this argument is fair enough. I think a pop-up informing the user about it and how to opt out is sufficient.

[โ€“] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Can't wait for ladybird to come out! Finally something that speaks our language.

[โ€“] greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I think Servo is a better option, it's also being written in rust.

[โ€“] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So long as it survives rusts complexity and lack of portability. I'm always down for more options!

[โ€“] greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

rust is complex and non-portable?

i've never heard of this, do you mind explaining what you mean better?

[โ€“] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

You joking? ๐Ÿ˜† I don't want to discourage you from giving rust a try but come on. Have you ever talked to a developer that spent any real time with rust, anyone that got as far as multi threading?

[โ€“] zorrothefox2001@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't Firefox supposed to incorporate Servo in some way or another before Quantum was developed?

[โ€“] greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

I think the Quantum release was what integrated some major components of the servo project.

[โ€“] timestatic 1 points 3 months ago

Looks really cool. I hope we don't have the overreliance on one rendering engine in the future. Once one or the other comes out I'll definitely try it out.

[โ€“] threeduck@aussie.zone 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Damn, 2026. I hope you CAN wait.

[โ€“] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

That or the free internet as we know it will be dead by the time it reaches production.

[โ€“] Zacryon 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've read the announcement. Sounds reasonable and sufficiently private to me. So saying "Mozilla wants your data" sounds misleading and like an overreaction to me. Also might help to mitigate the arms race in privacy protection versus tracking for ads and worse stuff.

Mozilla is definitely going to try more scummy crap like this in the future.

How do you know that?

Even if, there will still be alternatives. But right now, Firefox is the best browser with regards to privacy and security. It even passed minmum ratings by the german IT security authority, contrary to other widely used browsers.

[โ€“] SloganLessons@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Respectefully disagree. Reasonable would've been making it opt in, not opt out and justifying it with "would be too difficult to explain".

[โ€“] Zacryon 1 points 3 months ago

I'm with you on the opt-out vs. opt-in part. That's not a nice move. Regardless of that, Firefox is still the best choice. I hope they will continue to improve.

[โ€“] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 months ago

atleast its opt out