this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
207 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

58009 readers
2984 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (12 children)

It's obviously a great achievement though it would be nice to see improvements larger than 1-2%.

Let's hope the next one will be like a 10-12% improvement... though that's probably wishful thinking.

Storage is likely the bigger issue now.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 27 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I'm more concerned with longevity and use of more environmentally friendly materials with solar panels than efficiency. In about 30 years or so, they reach their end of life so there will be hazardous waste resulting from that.

[–] Mountain_Mike_420@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Remember that solar just doesn’t stop working at some random day. The efficiency drops to where it makes sense to replace then people like me come in and buy the panels for pennies on the dollar because a 18% efficient panel will work just fine.

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk -3 points 1 month ago

Will you be able to handle all these panels as it becomes economically reasonable for people to replace them?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)