this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
422 points (96.9% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2296 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Okay, so when I searched before I didn't find any Hamas flags in the protest. Google is fucking garbage these days.

Mea culpa.

That said, she didn't have to condemn everyone. She's running against Donald "very fine people on both sides" Trump. He knows he needs to speak to the extremes in his base to win, it's why he got even more votes in 2020 than in 2016, and she needs to speak to her own base too. Instead, she threw the baby out with the bathwater.

Whatever. Maybe she's just a coward and not willing to take a stand that would get attacked in the media. There's a reason she won't use the words "genocide" or "apartheid" or "settler-colonialism" or "war criminal"...

Let's see who her VP is, because if it's Josh "volunteered for the IDF" Shapiro then it's clear as day she's pro-genocide

(As an aside, flying Hamas's colors does help to educate people about anticolonial resistance - it's provocative, not wrong)

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That said, she didn't have to condemn everyone.

Then it's a good thing she didn't, and specifically singled out pro-Hamas sentiment.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

She did not come out in support for any of the protesters, she condemned them all equally.

But, like I said, let's see if she chooses Josh Shapiro. That'll tell us what we need to know.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Read her statement. She condemns and condemns and condemns, and doesn't say anything about support for any of the protesters. She merely came out in support of protest as a general concept, but you can hardly read that as her supporting the right to protest against Israel or Netanyahu.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is a convoluted uncharitable interpretation. She specifically condemns support of pro-Hamas graffiti and rhetoric. It's disingenuous to read that as blanket condemnation of all pro-Palestinian protesters.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

No where in her statement does she clarify that any of the people protesting Netanyahu were in the right. She didn't go that extra step to show any solidarity with any of the protesters, and maybe that's because she's a coward and didn't want to appear pro-Hamas. Yet, Trump wouldn't do that to his base. He'd condemn violence in general and then say there were very fine people on both sides, and by doing so he became even more popular. Harris missed an opportunity to make her position more clear.

In fact, she has been frustratingly vague about this entire situation! A ceasefire, but how long? Hostage release, but does that include the Palestinian hostages held by Israel? What about the ICC and ICJ decisions? What about UNRWA? Crickets...

She needs to make her position clear, and I think her VP pick will clarify it for a lot of people.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

She specified her criticism was against pro-Hamas, and you're saying because she didn't make an additional redundant statement to clarify what that means that she's implying something other than her literal words? And her call for ceasefire isn't specific enough, despite the fact that she doesn't have the authority to draft specific details anyway?

Your reading comprehension isn't justification for extrapolating these wild hypotheticals.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Her statement reads as a condemnation of all protesters as pro-Hamas. It paints with a broad brush.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We already established that this is straight up false. Ask your handler for better material.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We didn't establish shit, her statement doesn't separate the protesters into two groups.

Whatever. She didn't pick Shapiro which says, to me, that she's not willing to totally piss off the uncommitted movement. That's definitely positive.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Trump got that name trying to split that hair. And yeah I get the difference between the groups. But the entire point here is the American electorate at large doesn't.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

And the American electorate never will get the difference if politicians are too cowardly to make a stand.

But Trump got more votes after trying to split that hair. It worked. It's not even a bad strategic move.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's never been the big politicians who lead movements in the US, unless they came into office because of a movement. Even JFK didn't do civil rights until the movement was big enough.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, because US politicians are always opposed to change until it is forced upon them.

Yet in other countries political figures can, in fact, lead political movements. Why is the US different?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Because the system is different.