this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

37585 readers
295 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Those damn things are not ready to be used on public roads. Allowing them is one of the more prominent examples of corruption that we’ve seen recently.

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

Statistically they're still less prone to accidents than human drivers.

I never quite undestood why so many people seem to be against autonomous vehicles. Especially on Lemmy. It's unreasonable to demand perfection before any of these is used on the public roads. In my view the bar to reach is human level driving and after that it seems quite obvious that from safety's point of view it's the better choice.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fine by me, as long as the companies making the cars take all responsibility for accidents. Which, you know, the human drivers do.

But the car companies want to sell you their shitty autonomous driving software and make you be responsible.

If they don't trust it enough, why should I?

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well you shouldn't trust it and the car company tells you this. It's not foolproof and something to be blindly relied on. It's a system that assists driving but doesn't replace the driver. Not in it's current form atleast though they may be getting close.

[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

The discussed incident does not involve driving assist systems, driverless autonomous taxis are already on the streets:

A number of Cruise driverless vehicles were stopped in the middle of the streets of the Sunset District after Outside Lands in Golden Gate Park on Aug. 11, 2023.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)