this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
17 points (100.0% liked)

Legal News

218 readers
92 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Putting aside the whole “China Government Bad” propaganda for a moment, how is this any different than Meta or Google and their data collection/use? So it’s okay is a US-based company does it?

Don’t get me wrong; I don’t want any of these fuckers to have free rein to our data, and I certainly don’t want them influencing us in any way. If anything, I want them to be more “equal” and include Meta, Google, Apple, and everyone else in their legislation. We need a GDPR of our own.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You’re right that everyone does it. The issue is how much access China has to the data in this case.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I don’t disagree that it’s frightening. I’m suggesting that it’s equally as frightening that any company has the same level of access, if not more.

[–] GeneralDingus@lemmy.cafe 6 points 3 months ago

While I don't disagree, I'd prefer a law protecting consumer privacy regarding all digital data use but this law was never about protecting consumers. China is an aggressive adversarial state to the United States and its allies. From the perspective of national security it makes sense to limit what data an adversary has of your citizens.

load more comments (1 replies)