BoycottUnitedStates

328 readers
177 users here now

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
26
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/62256846

“The one thing that we have to watch is to make sure we don’t see more countries in a similar boat as where we are with China. We’re watching the EU,” Boeing CEO and President Kelly Ortberg said.

27
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/42836393

28
 
 

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/27183289

This executive order makes sweeping changes to Civil Rights. This is the document that the EO is referencing 28 C.F.R. 42.104


Things that the regime hopes to do:

  1. Centralize Power by Eliminating Checks and Balances

    • Meritocracy as a Smokescreen:
      • By framing the order as "restoring meritocracy," the regime could dismantle diversity initiatives that promote independent oversight (e.g., civil rights offices, diversity committees).
      • This weakens institutional resistance to authoritarianism by removing advocates for accountability.
    • Loyalty Over Competence:
      • In practice, "merit" could be redefined to prioritize political loyalty rather than objective qualifications.
      • Federal agencies could be purged of dissenting voices and replaced with loyalists, as seen in historical fascist regimes (e.g., Nazi Germany’s Gleichschaltung—coordination of institutions under party control).
  2. Suppress Opposition and Marginalized Groups

    • Roll Back Protections for Minorities:
      • By eliminating race or gender-conscious policies, the regime could systematically exclude minority groups from federal employment and contracting.
      • This aligns with fascist tactics of scapegoating certain demographics (e.g., Jews in Nazi Germany, immigrants in other regimes).
    • Legalizing Discrimination:
      • The changes to 28 CFR § 42.104 could make it harder to challenge discriminatory practices in court, as "affirmative action" remedies are restricted.
      • This creates a legal veneer for exclusionary policies.
  3. Control the Bureaucracy and Economy

    • Patronage Networks:
      • A fascist regime thrives on patronage—rewarding loyalists with jobs and contracts.
      • By removing diversity requirements, the government could funnel contracts to politically connected allies (e.g., corporate supporters of the regime).
    • Weaken Labor Protections:
      • Merit-based hiring could be used to break unions or activist groups by labeling them as "non-merit" influences.
      • This mirrors historical fascist suppression of labor movements (e.g., Mussolini’s corporatist state).
  4. Propaganda and Ideological Control

    • Manufacture a "Pure" National Identity:
      • Fascist regimes often promote myths of national purity (e.g., Nazi "Aryan supremacy").
      • The executive order could be spun as "ending divisive identity politics" and promoting a homogenized national workforce.
    • Scapegoating "Elites" and "Diversity Advocates":
      • The regime might frame diversity initiatives as corrupt or anti-American, rallying supporters against perceived enemies.
      • This is a classic fascist tactic (e.g., Hitler’s attacks on "cultural Marxists").
  5. Legal and Institutional Erosion

    • Undermine the Rule of Law:
      • The changes to 28 CFR § 42.104 weaken legal tools to fight discrimination, making it harder to prove systemic bias in court.
      • By altering regulations like 28 CFR § 42.104, the regime could normalize executive overreach—gradually eroding legal protections.
      • This paves the way for more extreme measures (e.g., suspending elections, militarizing law enforcement).
    • Preventing Future Resistance:
      • A workforce stripped of diversity and dissent is easier to control.
      • This aligns with historical fascist strategies of eliminating opposition within institutions (e.g., Nazi purges of "disloyal" civil servants).

Comparison to Historical Fascist Regimes

  • Nazi Germany (1930s):
    • Hitler’s Civil Service Law (1933) banned Jews and political opponents from government jobs, framing it as "restoring professionalism."
    • The Enabling Act (1933) allowed Hitler to bypass the legislature—similar to how executive orders can bypass Congress.
  • Mussolini’s Italy (1920s-30s):
    • The fascist syndicates replaced independent unions, ensuring loyalty to the state.
    • The Acerbo Law (1923) rigged elections to guarantee fascist dominance.
29
 
 

They should fuck off!

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/62263647

30
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/29020723

31
 
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/36568767

Feel free to pull this if it isn't appropriate for this community.

32
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/42837833

By all criteria, this a concentration camp. Not “concentration camp” as rhetorical inflation, or emotionally manipulative shorthand, or edgy metaphor—but as in: literally.

As in: detention without trial, state control, inhumane living conditions, forced labor, dehumanization, brutal violence, isolation from accountability, psychological torture, and—by every available logical extension—murder.

That last one we can’t yet verify in the strict evidentiary sense, but the circumstances suggest it like smoke suggests fire, and they are already trying to hide their actions and deny what is occurring.

33
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/42773920

34
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/42740975

35
 
 
36
 
 
37
 
 
38
39
 
 
40
 
 
41
42
 
 

cross-posted from: https://reddthat.com/post/39469940

  • Trump’s approval has taken a substantial swing of 9.6 points, from a net positive of 6.2 points in late January to a net negative of 3.4 points in mid-April.
  • Trump’s loss in support among Hispanic and young adults has been especially steep.
  • The president has not persuaded Americans that foreign countries and producers will bear the burden of higher tariffs, or that the gain will be worth the pain.
43
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28449242

Just had a couple of orders get cancelled as well.

44
 
 
45
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/42720192

What caused Donald Trump to walk back on many of his tariffs last week was not domestic pressure but a run on the market for US Treasuries led by large institutional savers. If US debt is no longer a safe asset, then American hegemony is also at risk.

46
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28462687

Summary

The MAGA cinematic universe has gone into full meltdown after the Supreme Court temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s latest deportation push.

The ruling halted deportations that rely on the Alien Enemies Act—in a stunning 7-2 decision. “The Supreme Court would rather actively participate in America’s ruination,” wrote DHS liaison Paul Ingrassia.

“We live in a society where foreign alien terrorists have unlimited free legal representation,” Stephen Miller posted.

Tom Fitton suggested Trump suspend habeas corpus to “reverse the Biden invasion.” “Who will compensate the American people for the lasting damage?” Rep. Mary Miller asked.

47
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/42595819

48
 
 
49
 
 
50
view more: ‹ prev next ›